Series Introduction:
We live in an era of science fiction films quite
different from the one we had half a century ago. Today, Transformers and
super hero franchises take the cake. Additionally, there are a host of reboot
films that take sci-fi classics and make them more modern. Jurassic World,
Star Trek, and Rise of the Planet of the Apes are such examples.
The modern emphasis is on heroism, action, and fun. Very little emphasis is
placed on writing in these kinds of films, and, as a result, they focus much
less on social commentary, which was an almost universal characteristic of
sci-fi films in the 1950s and 60s. Even when the elements for social commentary
are there—as in Mad Max: Fury Road and Elysium—they are hardly
explored. Sci-fi movies today are just more action movies.
In an effort to cultivate appreciation for the
social commentary of classic sci-fi films, I am doing a series of posts on the
cultural statements of various sci-fi films from the 1950s and 60s. Hopefully
in the future we will see more sci-fi films that resurrect this central aspect
of science fiction, as it seems unlikely to me that people can go on enjoying
movies that consist of the same kinds of flashy, prolonged action sequences,
weak plots, and poor dialogue.
Since
the world began, ever-inventive man has constantly pushed forward into the
unknown. One by one, the frontiers of science have fallen before him. . . . Now
he stands on the threshold of a new age—a terrifying age.
So begins The Strange World of Planet X (or, Cosmic Monsters, as it was titled in the
U.S.), a sci-fi film in which Dr. Laird, a scientist, has invented magnetic
fields that can attract objects from outer space. The invention has disastrous
side-effects, however, causing insects to mutate into giant monsters. The
inhabitants of earth are then aided by a visitor from another planet, who warns
them that continuing to use such technology will only result in further
devastation.
In all likelihood, the
film was originally intended to be a criticism of the use of nuclear power, but
its prophetic warning bears a striking resemblance to what many are boldly
claiming about our modern ecological crisis. The “terrifying age” of which we
are on the threshold is the age of the Anthropocene, in which the environment
bows before the short-term interests of human beings, with devastating
consequences.
On June 29th,
2015 the Supreme Court ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency’s Mercury
and Air Toxic Standards (MATS) program, which consisted of regulations aimed at
reducing power plant pollution. The reason for the Supreme Court ruling was
that the agency did not sufficiently consider the costs their regulations would
impose on power plants.
This decision oddly came
only a month after Pope Francis released an encyclical on caring for the
environment. In it he warned, “If present trends continue, this century may
well witness extraordinary climate change and an unprecedented destruction of
ecosystems, with serious consequences for all of us.”[1] In
one corner, the Supreme Court demands the EPA to consider the costs of their
regulations for power plants; in the other, Pope Francis urges the world to
consider the costs of their behavior for the environment.
Milton Friedman wrote,
“The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits.”[2]
Have we become a culture of business,
in which the social responsibility of society is to increase business profits?
Thus, Congress does not pass legislation without crosschecking it with
lobbyists who represent special interests groups and large corporations. Thus,
the EPA cannot consider the interests of the environment without crosschecking its
approach with the costs for power plants.
Pope Francis offers a
biting criticism of this cultural condition, saying that, “Where profits alone
count, there can be no thinking about the rhythms of nature, its phases of
decay and regeneration, or the complexity of ecosystems which may be gravely
upset by human intervention.”[3] He
charges us with the task of stewardship, making the common good our common
goal. The most pressing issue is not what environmental regulation will cost power
plants, but what the lack of environmental regulation will cost the earth.
In many ways, prophets
are visitors from another planet. They bear the burden of living by a higher
standard, and calling the world to that standard. Moses had the Promised Land.
Jesus had the Kingdom of God. Martin Luther King, Jr. had the dream. Prophets
are ahead of their time. They come from the future, they come from another
planet, to warn us and beckon us toward justice.
Pope Francis took up the
role of the prophet and spoke to us like the visitor from The Strange World: If you continue down this path, you will be met
with destruction; but if you turn from your evil ways, as the prophets would
say, then you will be met with abundant life.
“Why then will you die?”
asked the prophet Ezekiel.
No comments:
Post a Comment